When a brand commissions user-generated content through a platform, the contract language determines whether the brand receives ownership of the content or a limited permission to use it. This distinction affects how long the brand can run ads, which channels are permitted, and whether renegotiation is required for new uses. Billo and Insense, two major UGC platforms, structure these rights differently. Billo describes a creator obligation to assign intellectual property rights to the brand upon payment and acceptance of deliverables. Insense retains creator ownership while granting the brand a perpetual, non-exclusive license to use content on digital and connected TV channels. Understanding these operational models helps brands avoid disputes over content reuse, clarifies what approval and payment actually activate, and identifies which uses require separate negotiation. This comparison examines the exact platform terms to show how each platform defines the activation event, channel scope, and conditions for extended rights like offline or broadcasting use. [4] [5] [6]
How Billo Structures Content Rights Through Assignment
Billo's terms describe content rights as an assignment from creator to brand. Section 8.1 of Billo's Brand Terms states that creators are contractually obligated to irrevocably assign and transfer all rights, title, and interest in intellectual property subsisting in deliverables to the brand on a worldwide basis for the full duration of those rights. This assignment is conditional on two events: the brand's full payment of the order fee and the brand's acceptance of the deliverables. The terms describe the assignment as irrevocable, but also say Billo does not guarantee that the transfer has been effectively secured; the brand remains responsible for checking that it holds the required rights. Unless the order or a separate written agreement says otherwise, the stated assigned rights include the right to edit, format, translate, adapt, or modify deliverables; use the creator's image, name, voice, or likeness as depicted in the deliverables; distribute deliverables in any media, language, or territory; repost, share, or comment across all digital channels; and sublicense, assign, or create derivative works without restriction. This framing treats the deliverables as property that moves from creator to brand rather than as a licensed permission. [4]
Billo's assignment model includes an important restriction on artificial intelligence use. Even though the brand receives broad rights to modify and create derivative works, the terms explicitly prohibit using AI or automated tools to alter, synthesize, or generate a materially different depiction of a creator's voice, likeness, physical appearance, clothing, or location without express, separate written consent from the creator. This restriction applies regardless of the sublicense and derivative-work rights otherwise granted. The terms clarify that this prohibition does not extend to editing, processing, or enhancing deliverables using AI for color correction, background removal, noise reduction, captioning, cropping, or translation. The distinction is between enhancement of existing content and creation of an AI-altered depiction that materially changes how the creator appears. Billo also requires creators to waive moral rights to the maximum extent permitted by law, or, where waiver is unavailable, to refrain from enforcing them against lawful brand use. Creators retain their objection rights for an AI-altered depiction made without the required separate consent. [4]
How Insense Structures Content Rights Through License and Ownership Retention
Insense's terms take a different approach by explicitly stating that creators retain ownership of campaign content. The Insense Terms of Service state that all right, title, and interest, including all intellectual property rights in campaign content, are owned exclusively by the creator unless otherwise agreed to in a campaign brief. This ownership retention is the starting point. Rather than transferring ownership, Insense grants the brand a limited license. Upon receiving all payments required and subject to creator approval, Insense grants the sponsor a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, perpetual, sublicenseable, irrevocable right to use, modify, create derivative works of, reproduce, distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, post, publish, promote, and run advertisements using campaign content for the sole purpose of organic and paid use on digital marketing and connected TV channels. This license is perpetual, meaning it does not expire, but it is non-exclusive, meaning the creator can license the same content to other brands. The digital and CTV rights are included in the base campaign fee and cover social media platforms, video-sharing platforms, websites, streaming services, advertising networks, programmatic or demand-side platforms, and retail media networks. [5] [6]
Insense's model separates digital rights from extended rights that require additional negotiation and payment. Broadcasting rights, which cover use on broadcasting channels, and offline rights, which cover non-digital marketing channels, are not included in the base license. These extended rights must be requested and purchased separately from the creator through Insense. Additionally, sponsors can purchase an assignment of all of the creator's rights, title, and interest in campaign content, which would transfer full ownership to the sponsor, but this is treated as a distinct purchase option, not the default. The help-center explanation puts content approval and payment to its creator before the brand receives permission, with no expiry, for use across digital marketing channels. Within that scope, the brand may keep and copy the files, upload or share them, display or distribute the material, edit it, and make derivative versions. The help-center article lists the included channels as social media, websites, digital newsletters, blogs, and email marketing. The help article's examples do not narrow the wider digital and connected-TV scope stated in the terms. Broadcasting rights outside that included scope, offline rights, and an ownership assignment are separate options. [5]
Insense also restricts AI use of creator likeness. A sponsor needs a specific agreement with the creator before generating further AI campaign material outside Insense using that creator's identity. The restriction covers visual attributes, including appearance, likeness, silhouette and caricature, as well as the creator's image, voice and other sounds. This restriction applies to uses outside the platform and to AI generation specifically. The terms also preserve the creator's editorial control over Campaign Content and require permission for editorial changes. That provision sits alongside the broad modification license and the separate AI approval process; none should be presented in isolation as resolving permission for every possible edit. The platform offers AI-tools licensed by Insense for modifying and adapting work product and campaign content, and sponsors can generate AI campaign content based on campaign content using these tools. However, any AI campaign content created by the sponsor must be submitted for approval to the creator via platform chat, and the creator has the right to terminate the license to campaign content if the creator disapproves of the AI campaign content. If the creator fails to disapprove within 14 days, the AI campaign content is deemed approved and becomes final and nonrevocable. [5]
Activation Events: Payment, Acceptance, and Approval Conditions
On Billo, the assignment of rights is triggered by two conditions: full payment of the order fee and acceptance of the deliverables by the brand. Billo's terms state that the creator is contractually obligated to assign rights subject to these two conditions. Payment is charged upfront at the time of order creation, so the payment condition is typically satisfied immediately. Acceptance is the second condition. Billo defines an order as complete once the brand approves the final content and confirms satisfactory performance of the services. The brand must review deliverables promptly and confirm completion without undue delay. The brand may request revisions consistent with the agreed scope, provided such requests are reasonable, clearly communicated, and do not introduce new requirements or material changes. Once the brand approves the final content, the creator becomes eligible for payment in accordance with Billo's payment section. This means that approval and payment are linked: approval triggers the creator's eligibility for payment, and once payment is processed, the assignment of rights is complete. The brand cannot use deliverables before approval and payment are finalized, as the rights have not yet transferred. [4]
On Insense, the license grant is also conditional on payment and approval, but the language is structured differently. Insense makes its license conditional on receiving the sponsor's required payments. Separately, its definitions identify sponsor-approved Work Product as Campaign Content, and the help article connects the brand's digital rights to approval and payment. Insense's review and approval section states that the sponsor will have the opportunity to review and approve all work product, with up to three rounds of revisions included in the creator fees. If the work product is fully compliant with the campaign brief, the sponsor will not unreasonably withhold, condition, or delay approval. If the sponsor still fails or refuses to approve work product that is fully compliant after the included rounds of revisions, the creator is entitled to payment of at least 50 percent of the agreed creator fees. This provision protects the creator from indefinite withholding of approval. Once the sponsor approves the work product, it becomes campaign content, and the license grant is activated. The Insense help-center article states that once content has been approved and the creator has been paid, brands are granted perpetual digital rights. This indicates that both approval and payment must occur before the license is active. [5] [6]
Channel Scope and Duration: What Uses Are Included and What Require Negotiation
| Channel or Use Type | Billo Assignment | Insense Digital License | Insense Extended Rights |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social media platforms | Included (all digital channels) | Included | N/A [4] |
| Paid advertising on digital platforms | Included (all media) | Included | N/A [4] |
| Websites and email marketing | Included (all media) | Included | N/A [4] |
| Broadcasting outside the included Digital/CTV scope | Included (all media, language, territory) | Not included | Requires separate purchase [4] |
| Offline marketing channels | Included (all media) | Not included | Requires separate purchase [4] |
| Duration of rights | Perpetual (full duration of copyright) | Perpetual (digital license only) | Perpetual (if purchased) [4] [5] |
Billo describes an assignment that applies worldwide for the full duration of the relevant intellectual-property rights. Unless the order or a separate written agreement provides otherwise, the stated scope covers distribution through present or future media, across languages and territories, as well as transfer, sublicensing and derivative works. The brand therefore does not need a new grant merely because a covered use involves another campaign or an agency. That scope remains subject to the agreement's conditions and its separate-consent requirement for materially different AI depictions of the creator. The terms also distinguish those depictions from ordinary editing or enhancement. Billo does not guarantee that an assignment has been effectively secured, so the brand must verify the permissions it needs. [4]
Insense's default digital license is narrower in scope. The perpetual license covers organic and paid use on digital marketing and connected TV channels, which Insense defines as social media platforms, video-sharing platforms, websites, streaming services, advertising networks, programmatic or demand-side platforms, and retail media networks. The help-center article lists social media, websites, digital newsletters, blogs, and email marketing as included channels. Connected-TV use is expressly included. Broadcasting rights outside the stated Digital and CTV Rights, and offline uses such as print, billboards or in-store displays, require separately arranged rights. A brand should therefore distinguish a connected-TV placement within the included scope from a broadcasting use that needs an additional grant. If a brand wants to use campaign content in offline marketing, it must request and purchase offline rights separately. The Insense terms state that these extended rights are detailed in the respective campaign brief and purchased from the creator through Insense. Additionally, sponsors can request an assignment of all of the creator's rights, title, and interest in campaign content, but the scope of that assignment must be agreed separately rather than assumed identical to Billo's terms. [5] [6]
Ownership Implications and Practical Reuse Scenarios
The difference between assignment and license has practical implications for how brands can reuse content. Billo's model calls for an ownership assignment once the payment and acceptance conditions are satisfied. Within the scope of that assignment and any order-specific agreement, the stated permissions include modification, sublicensing and use in later campaigns. The separate-consent requirement for AI-altered depictions still applies, and Billo says the brand must ensure the necessary rights were secured. This ownership model is simpler for brands that want maximum flexibility and do not want to manage ongoing permissions. However, it also means the brand bears full responsibility for ensuring the content complies with laws, platform policies, and brand safety standards. Under Insense's license model, the creator retains ownership and the brand has a permission to use the content within defined channels. If the brand wants to use the content in a channel not covered by the digital license, it must negotiate and pay for extended rights. Insense grants modification and derivative-work rights, but its Member Content section also retains creator editorial control and requires permission for editorial changes to Campaign Content. An additional process governs creator approval of AI campaign content. The applicable campaign brief and these distinct clauses need to be considered together rather than treating the license alone as permission for every edit. For brands, this model requires more upfront planning about which channels will be used and may require additional negotiations if use cases change. However, it also provides clarity about what is and is not permitted, reducing the risk of disputes. [4] [5]
Billo scenario: A brand commissions a 30-second video from a creator through Billo. The brand pays the order fee and approves the video. The terms call for rights to be assigned after payment and acceptance; the brand must still check that it has secured the permissions needed for its intended use. The brand can run the video as a paid ad on Meta, TikTok, and YouTube; repost it on the brand's social media channels; use it in email marketing; modify it by adding text overlays or cutting it into shorter clips; license it to an agency to run on the brand's behalf; or use it in a future campaign without returning to the creator for permission. The assignment's stated derivative-work permissions remain subject to the order and any separate agreement. A materially different AI depiction of the creator requires separate written consent. [4]
Insense scenario: A brand commissions a 30-second video from a creator through Insense. The brand pays the creator fee and approves the video. Upon approval and payment, the brand receives a perpetual, non-exclusive license to use the video on digital and connected TV channels. The brand can run the video as a paid ad on Meta, TikTok, and YouTube; repost it on the brand's social media channels; use it in email marketing; and modify it for these digital channels. Connected-TV advertising is within the stated included scope. A broadcasting placement outside those Digital and CTV Rights, or a print advertisement, requires the corresponding additional rights. If the brand wants to license the video to an agency, the agency can use it only on the same digital and connected TV channels. Insense's license includes modification rights, while its Member Content clause separately requires creator permission for editorial changes to Campaign Content. The platform also has an additional approval process for AI campaign content generated with its licensed tools: the creator can disapprove of that AI material and terminate the underlying campaign-content license. This comparison does not assume that one provision overrides the others for a particular modification. [5]
Moral Rights, Creator Protections, and Dispute Resolution
Both platforms address moral rights, which are legal rights that creators have in some jurisdictions to be credited for their work, to object to modifications, or to prevent their work from being used in a way that harms their reputation. Billo's creator agreements seek a moral-rights waiver or a commitment not to assert those rights, within what the applicable law allows. If the law prevents a waiver, the creator instead promises not to enforce those rights against a brand's lawful use of the delivered material. This waiver does not extend to AI-altered depictions, meaning creators retain the right to object to AI-altered depictions even if they have waived other moral rights. Insense does not explicitly require a moral rights waiver in the main terms, but the platform does restrict creator control over AI campaign content. Creators can approve or disapprove AI campaign content created by sponsors, and if creators disapprove within 14 days, they can terminate the license to the campaign content. That AI procedure is not the only provision relevant to modifications. The Member Content section separately preserves creator editorial control over Campaign Content and requires permission for editorial changes. The broad modification license, those conditions and the applicable campaign brief must be read together; this comparison does not determine how they apply to a particular change. [4] [5]
Both platforms include dispute resolution mechanisms, but they differ in structure. For order-related complaints about withheld payment, slow approval or errors, Billo can ask the brand for information while examining the matter in good faith. Its terms identify several forms of unfair conduct: a rejection with no clear, reasonable explanation; no reply to a submission during the review window; repeated approval delays despite conformity with the brief; and using or publishing a deliverable, or referring to it, before the creator is paid. Repeated or unresolved conduct of this kind can lead to an account review and possible restrictions or suspension. The general dispute procedure in Insense's terms calls for consultation and good-faith negotiation between the sponsor and Insense. Under that procedure, an unresolved dispute after 30 days proceeds to a single arbitrator under American Arbitration Association rules. The arbitration is binding and final, and the costs are shared equally between sponsor and Insense. Insense also reserves the right to resolve disputes over whether work product complies with the campaign brief in its sole discretion based on the campaign brief and subsequent communications. [4] [5]
Methodology and limitations
This comparison is based on a direct reading of the current platform terms of service and help-center documentation from Billo and Insense. Billo's terms were effective as of September 23, 2026, and Insense's terms were last modified on May 29, 2026. The Insense help-center article on content ownership was accessed on the same date. The analysis preserves the exact language and structure of each platform's terms, distinguishing between assignment language in Billo's Section 8.1 and license language in Insense's grant of rights section. The comparison identifies the specific conditions that activate rights (payment and acceptance for Billo; payment and approval for Insense), the scope of included channels (all media for Billo; digital and connected TV for Insense), and the treatment of extended rights (included in Billo's assignment; separately negotiated for Insense). The analysis also documents the AI-altered depiction restrictions on both platforms and the moral rights provisions. This is a selected public-document reconciliation of two platforms' current terms, not a representative survey of all UGC platforms or a legal determination of enforceability. [4] [5] [6]
Source observations retrieved on . Retrieval dates are distinct from any study measurement period.
Platform terms can change at any time, and individual campaign agreements or campaign briefs may add, modify, or override the default terms described here. Billo's terms state that the company may amend the brand terms from time to time and will post any new version with an updated effective date. Insense's terms similarly reserve the right to modify the terms at any time. Additionally, Insense's terms state that in the event of a conflict between a campaign brief and the terms of service, the campaign brief will govern. This means that a specific campaign agreement may grant different rights than the default terms. Brands and creators should review the specific campaign brief or order details for any campaign to confirm the actual rights being granted. [4] [5]
Assignment language in Billo's terms is not a guarantee that every creator complies with the assignment obligation. Billo's terms state that the company has entered into binding legal agreements with all creators under which creators are contractually obligated to assign rights, but Billo also disclaims liability for a creator's performance and states that it does not guarantee that rights have been or will be effectively assigned. Billo places the responsibility on the brand to ensure that necessary rights have been properly obtained from the creator. Similarly, Insense's license grant is conditional on the creator's agreement, and disputes over whether a creator has properly granted rights may arise. Brands should verify that creators have signed the platform's creator terms before assuming that rights have been transferred or licensed. [4] [5]
Creator likeness, AI-altered depictions, and offline permission must not be inferred from general content rights. Both Billo and Insense explicitly restrict the use of AI to create materially different depictions of a creator's likeness without separate consent. This restriction applies even if the brand has broad rights to modify and create derivative works. Additionally, Insense's default digital license does not include offline or broadcasting rights, so a brand cannot assume that it can use content in print, television, or other non-digital channels without separate negotiation. Brands should carefully review the specific restrictions and extended rights options before planning campaigns that involve AI use, offline channels, or broadcasting. [4] [5]
Apply the calculations
Use the ROAS calculator and CPA calculator with matching cost and revenue definitions.